In which situation would an inspector advance without reviewing previous inspection details?

Advancing without reviewing previous inspection details is justified in situations where there are no documented changes to the conditions or configurations of the pressure vessel since the last inspection. This means that the inspector can rely on the current operation and maintenance status of the vessel, implying that the existing data remains relevant and applicable. If there are no changes reported, the inspector may continue with the inspection more efficiently, assuming that the internal and external conditions have not changed significantly.

In scenarios involving new vessels, a review of past inspection documents is not necessary, as there would be no history to examine. However, advancement based solely on the vessel being new might overlook the significance of even initial operational checks. The approach that all inspections require document reviews would be overly cautious in cases where continuity of operation has been maintained without alteration. Thus, the environment and conditions suggest that there is no need for a retrospective review to proceed safely and effectively with the current assessment.